Adjust Font Size [ + ] [ – ] [ o ]

Victorian Archives Centre public opening hours

Monday to Friday: 10:00 am to 4:30 pm
(excl. public holidays)
The second and last Saturday of every month

Citing the records featured in Behind Closed Doors feature in this month’s The Age Melbourne Magazine

Public Record Office Victoria or rather, some famous items from our Collection were proudly featured in The Age Melbourne Magazine’s Behind Closed Doors section which was published today. This posting provides you with some additional information, including citations, in case you are interested in viewing some of these items.

Two of the larger items featured are popular stops on the tours that are regularly run by our volunteers of the storage area.  One of these is the Monster Half Mile Petition, one of the larger petitions found within VPRS 3253 Original Papers Tabled in the Legislative Assembly.  The postal stamp display was created by the Victorian Government Printer as a means to showcase Victoria’s printing skills during the 1899 Greater Britain Exhibition in Earl’s Court, London. Refer to our website for details of these tours.

A digital image of the Ned Kelly record featured is easily accessible in our online catalogue.  It is a prisoner information sheet created by prison authorities about Ned Kelly for Victoria Police detectives that was subsequently included in the Kelly criminal trial brief.  It was provided by the Police to the prosecution in responses to a request conveyed in a document known as a query sheet.  This is a means whereby the prosecution can obtain pieces of evidence after the committal hearing whilst the prosecution’s case is in development.  The query sheet including the prisoner information sheet is available on line as VPRS 4966/P0 Kelly Historical Collection – Part II Crown Law Department, unit 1, item 1.  (It is a couple of images into the digitised document.)

Also available online are a number of the volumes which make up VPRS 515 Central Register of Male Prisoners and represented by the image captioned “The Naughty List”.  VPRS 515 was arguably the single most damaged series in our entire collection.  Over the last few years, most of these volumes have been the subject of conservation action under the steady hands of Nick Selenitsch who also features in The Age article.  Another image, captioned “Rough Justice”, appears to show the spine from one of the volumes of this series that had become detached.  Rebinding is prohibitively expensive and, in any case, much conservation action is aimed at restoring records to the point so that these can be imaged for access purposes.  The calico cover seen in the background of this particular image would have originally been put over the volume to prevent the migration of red rot (i.e the degration of leather that leaves a red stain) to the clothing of users rather than to hold the volume together. 

Among the most striking images is the poster of the “Too Risque” lady.  The poster is part of Chief Secretary’s inwards correspondence file [19]18/Y4199 in VPRS 3992/P0 Inward Registered Correspondence III, unit 1453.  The poster was provided as evidence in an attempt to have it banned, the Chief Secretary’s Department at the time being responsible for censorship.

The file number for the “Too Risque” poster file was originally allocated by records staff of the Department from volumes which we refer to as registers of inwards correspondence.  The image captioned “Spine-tingling” shows registers from VPRS 3994.  This is one of three series of registers created by the Chief Secretary’s Department to record the receipt and subsequent management of correspondence received that collectively spans the period 1851 -  ?1963.  (VPRS 3994 spans the period 1884 – 1963.)

The image of the box captioned “Box of Tricks” is the box which today holds the “Too Risque” poster.  The poster was originally found folded and attached to its file in a standard PROV box along with a number of other files.  The box shown was primarily created to enable the poster to be stored in its flat unfolded state but in the same box in which it was originally located.  The segments visible in the box are there to prevent the contents of the box (i.e. the files) from unnecessarily moving around should the box be ordered.

The image captioned “Hoddle’s Notes” highlights one of our more recent accessions.  It is VPRS 16685/P1 Surveyors’ Field Books, Black Sequence, unit 12, bundle 79. There are two field

books in this bundle from 1837, number 1151 and 1154.  These contain Hoddle’s first surveys of the Melbourne area.  VPRS 16685 is one of a number of survey field book series received from the Department of Sustainability and Environment.  For details of other field books series received in the same accession refer in the online catalogue to VPRS 16686 and VPRS 16687.

Finally, the article shows other records that do not require additional comment.  All of the Olympic records featured are all from VPRS 10743 /P0 Correspondence – Subject Series, unit 1.  The images captioned “Grim log” and “Gruesome Details are both from the same record.  This is VPRS 14526/P1, unit 1 Particulars of Execution Book. 

If you were to create a feature highlighting records from our Collection, what would you choose?  If you have an opinion, we’d love to hear from you.

Charlie Farrugia
Senior Collections Advisor

 

Strategic Management Standard Review

In 2009 PROV began a two-year project to develop a comprehensive suite of Recordkeeping Standards. It is now two years since the Strategic Management Standard and its associated Specification, Guidelines and Fact Sheets were released.

In line with our Continuous Improvement Program, a review of the Strategic Management suite of standards products is now underway. The initial consultation period has begun and will continue through to December 2012. PROV will release an issues paper in 2013 and seek further feedback to identify revisions and new products to be developed.

We are seeking feedback from all interested parties. We would like to hear about your experiences with the standards documents. Have you found them to be practical and implementable? Are they relevant and up-to-date? Are there any gaps in coverage that could be addressed by new documents?

There are multiple ways you can contribute to the Review. You can complete the comprehensive Survey on our website. This survey is completely anonymous and data gathered will help us to identify the significant issues.

Detailed comment and feedback can also be sent directly to the project team at standards@prov.vic.gov.au.

 For further information on how to contribute to the Strategic Management Standards Review, contact Matt Gardiner, Policy Officer Standards and Education on 9348 5645 .

Furry Friends from the late 1930s – Be Kind to Animals week

Record of the Month – October 2012

The first week of October is Be Kind to Animals Week and to celebrate, Public Record Office Victoria brings you a photographic collection of beloved pets from yesteryear.

The first thing I noticed about these images is that while human fashions may have changed over the last 100 years, those of our pets have not, even if we are to imagine that these show dogs might have been more image-conscious than their more commonplace K9 counterparts.

These glass plate scans are taken from our Photographic Negatives: Railways collection (VPRS 12903) which, despite its name, holds a vast array of images covering a whole swathe of different subjects. The series is also digitised and available online via a custom, keyword-searchable index here.

Public Record Office Victoria contributes to our furry friends by donating shredded paper to The Lost Dogs Home, though not from our archives of course! For more information about Be Kind to Animals Week, visit http://www.bekindtoanimalsweek.org.

VPRS 12903 (Photographic Negatives: Railways: Box Systems)
Consignment P1 Unit 373 Items 1 through 17
“Various breeds of show dogs, with owners and children. Late 1930s.”

Creating Agency:
Victorian Railways (VA 2876) Circa 1920-1983

Agency currently responsible:
Department of Infrastructure (VA 3971) 1999 – cont

Robin Waters
Access Services Officer

Nudge and Behavioural Insights

I was lucky enough to attend the recent IPAA 2012 Conference (http://www.ipaa2012.org.au/). One of the presentations was by David Halpern (Director, Behavioural Insight Team at Cabinet Office). In this presentation, David identified a number of activities that his office was undertaking. The Behavioural Insights team is linked to the Nudge programs and Big Society. There is lots of information about these two on the internet if you want to look them up.

The Behavioural Insights team identifies its program as: “… a remit to find innovative ways of encouraging, enabling and supporting people to make better choices for themselves. The Team’s work draws on insights from the growing body of academic research in the fields of behavioural economics and psychology which show how often subtle changes to the way in which decisions are framed can have big impacts on how people respond to them.”

The presentation at the conference drew from successful examples of influencing behaviour. I found the presentation heartening. It is commonly stated and perhaps more commonly believed that it is very hard to our customers, stakeholders, the general public service to be motivated to implement good information management practices, or to even go out of their way to help themselves, let alone do anything to assist others. The work by BIT provided examples that indicate that substantial changes in behaviour can be achieved even in areas where this may seem surprising. For example: “Letters that encourage tax payment In February 2011, HMRC – supported by BIT – began a trial to establish the impact of altering the messages sent in letters to encourage tax debtors to pay tax owed. HMRC and BIT designed a suite of letters, which were sent to people owing self-assessment tax debts for the first time.  By April, the trial had achieved the following results: 

 

The messages identified for each control group that people: – nationally paid their taxes – within the local postcode paid their taxes – within the town paid their taxes Within each group the results were higher than the control group and greatest for the local community. Other examples demonstrated the importance of: – making messages, immediate, personal, simple and demonstrating consequences (both positive and negative) – understanding the causes for not undertaking action. One study indicated that the reason that many people didn’t insulate their roof areas, even though it was very cost effective to do so was because these areas are used for storage. Providing a program to encourage clearing out the roof areas, resulted in much greater insulation.

David Brown

Recordkeeping and the Public Records Act

Often there appears to be confusion about the drivers for keeping records and the role of the Public Records Act (PRAct). A good example of this confusion can be seen in the often repeated statement;
“The Public Records Act makes public servants keep records.”

Actually, the need for public servants to keep records is not driven by the PRAct. Further, even if there was no PRAct, public servants would still need to keep records of their activities. Consider;
1. Governments create agencies and employ public servants/contractors to do something. Records are required as evidence that these people are doing that something for which they were employed.
2. The government and all Victorians are interested in ensuring effectiveness and efficiency. As a result agencies are required to supply a range of reports based on accurate documentation (records) of the activities undertaken.
3. Government and the public allocate funds to agencies and want to ensure that these funds are appropriately employed. As a result records are required to prove that funds are properly acquitted.
4. There is a whole raft of legislation that identifies the need to keep records not related to the specific purpose of the agency. As a result records are required to demonstrate compliance to health and safety, privacy, public release of information requirements plus many more.

A cursory review of Victorian Government policy will see the breadth and depth of non PRAct recordkeeping requirements expectations and requirements. Just three examples are enough (see the parts that I have underlined):
1. Public Sector Code of Conduct . For instance s5.4 identifies that Public Servants should be open to scrutiny.
Public sector employees implement government policy in an open and transparent manner. They maintain accurate and reliable records as required by relevant legislation, policies and procedures. Records are kept in such a way as to ensure their security and reliability and are made available to appropriate scrutiny when required.
2. Victorian Government Procurement Board . For instance s1. Purchase of Goods or Services less than $25,000. A minimum of one written quote is to be obtained.
(a department may adopt a practice of accepting a minimum of one verbal quote for values up to 10% of the above threshold. Details of the offer from a supplier are to be documented and filed appropriately)
3. The Financial Management Compliance Framework (FMCF) User Guide . For instance Requirement 1 identifies that the “CFAO and/or the Accountable Officer have an obligation to provide a statement to the Responsible Body stating that:
 the financial reports present fairly, in all material respects, of the financial condition and operating results of the Agency
 the financial reports have been prepared in accordance with the Financial Management Act 1994 including the Directions

What the PRAct and the Records Management Standards do is:
1. ensure that responsibilities for records and recordkeeping are clearly identified. In summary PROV is responsible for setting standards (advising) and Heads of Agencies are responsible for delivering good records and recordkeeping .
2. provide standards that allow the consistency of practice and definitions to support implementable minimum standard policies and practices.

If there was no PRAct, then there would be:
 an increase in the financial costs of doing government business.
There are hundreds of government departments and agencies and tens of thousands of public servants. Each agency would repeat the development of records management standards or wouldn’t have any, supporting irregular and inconsistent practices.
 an increase in the regulatory burden of government to the Victorian community.
The requirements for the public and public servants would vary from agency to agency. Without a coordinating set of Standards being provided, each of the agencies and therefore the public servants that work for them would create and use different arrangements and standards from the ineffective to the over servicing.
 a decrease in the ability of government to deliver efficiencies and better services.
Consistency of records management practice supports the capture and management of data and records, allowing government to interchange data, manage of machinery of government changes, undertake data mining and reporting and more effectively compare value over time.

In summary, the PRAct and the related recordkeeping standards provide government with consistency of practice, reduce costs and support improvements and efficiency of service delivery.

David Brown

FAQs – News

We’re pleased to announce that many of the most common questions asked by our government and vendor clients along with PROV’s answers have now been incorporated into a Government FAQ section of our website. This covers such topics as disposal, transfer, VERS, general recordkeeping, digitisation, social media and instant messaging.

The FAQs can be accessed at the following URL:
http://prov.vic.gov.au/government/faq-government-users

These will be progressively added to in time with other topics to include such things as cloud computing.

What’s New on the Wiki: Property, Possums and a Protector

You’re probably wondering what on earth property, possums and a Chinese Protector could possibly have in common? These are all topics that that have been contributed recently on the PROV Wiki.

Take a walk through time in East Street

If you’ve ever thought about researching the history of your home a must-see is the East Street Case Study developed by our property research guru Gertie Cotteril.

The Case Study brings to life a section of East Street in Ballarat East and explores the history of eight different properties. It demonstrates the power of the Wiki in its ability to draw together different records. It show that property research often takes you beyond bricks and mortar, and leads you to records about the lives of people, streets and even communities.

Have a read of our next streets going up on the Wiki, Victoria Street, Flemington by researcher Robbie Stockfeld and Albert Street, Sebastopol by Liz Denny. 

Conservation of Leadbeater’s Possum

 Who would have thought the history of the conservation of a possum could have so many interesting twists and turns?

Taking on what he thought was a small project on the PROV Wiki, Dean Haywood’s research has snowballed and taken on a life of its own. This fascinating account of a possums rediscovery includes maps, reports and correspondence from colourful characters such as Journalist Norman McCance and conservationist Des Hackett.

 

Transcription of W.H. Foster’s Diary

The Letterbook, Reports and Diary of William Henry Foster, the first Chinese protector appointed to Ballarat in 1851 has now been transcribed on the Wiki. This diary documents the life of a government official living and working on the Ballarat goldfields.

Would you like to help transcribe historical records? We have a number of records on our Wiki page which require transcribing. Check them out here.

 

Olympics Photos on the Wiki

Last but not least, the PROV Wiki now displays approximately 25,000 images in our Olympics and Public Transport Corporation photo collections.

Take a look at this new page featuring a story from past Olympian Albie Thomas. Albie tells his story of how he had bought tickets to watch from the stands, but ended up competing on the track instead!

If, like Albie, you have further information to add to any of our Olympics photos, it is now easier to contribute on these photo pages. Just click on the link next to the image which says ‘Edit this page’ to share your knowledge of the image.

 

Quick Wiki Stats

Number of pages: 59,086
Semantic property values: 433,213 for 66 different properties including;
People: 2177
Locations: 1076
Occupations: 344
Ships: 30
Diseases: 7
Narcotics: 6

Become a PROV Wiki Warrior

If you’re keen to contribute to the Wiki and would like some assistance, contact Online Engagement Officer lisa.fletcher@prov.gov.au

Copyright, Creators and Collecting Institutions: 2012 Update

On 23 August 2012, the University of Melbourne’s Centre for Media and Communications Law (CMCL) presented an update on their research program, Cultural Collections, Creators and Copyright: Museums, Galleries, Libraries and Archives and Australia’s Digital Heritage.

Hosted by Professor Andrew Kenyon, Joint-Director of the CMCL, the session saw three speakers address legal and practical issues for collecting institutions such as copyright exceptions and flexibility, licensing models and the New Zealand experience with online collections. Abigail Belfrage and Matt Gardiner (your faithful authors) attended on behalf of PROV and here’s what we found to be especially interesting.

Susan Corbett, Victoria University of Wellington
Susan spoke about her research into copyright law and its application in New Zealand in relation to museums, libraries and archives. Here are some findings from her research, which included interviews with staff from collecting institutions:

  • Archives exceptions in copyright law apply to libraries and archives but not museums
  • s51A of the Copyright Act 1968, relating to reproducing and communicating works for preservation and other purposes, permits only a single copy to be made of an item, and for preservation purposes only

The following scenarios are the most common in New Zealand:

  • staff find copyright law, including exceptions provided for archives and libraries, so difficult to interpret and apply that it is often ignored in practice
  • organisations are also risk-averse regarding making digitised material available on their websites without permission from copyright holders; digitised material is often only posted online with permission
  • many orphan works remain undigitised and/or unavailable online

Susan’s recommendations are to propose some changes to copyright legislation regarding exceptions, to better support the work of collecting institutions, including:

  • explicitly refer to museums and galleries in the Act
  • do not limit exceptions to not-for-profit organisations
  • allow for multiple digital copies to be made by organisations

Dr Emily Hudson, University of Oxford
Dr Hudson spoke about her research into copyright law, comparing legislation in US and Canada. Findings included:

  • There is a better knowledge of copyright exceptions in the US
  • There are less severe legal consequences for copyright breaches in the US

She suggested the need for guidance from government regarding the use of flexibility inherent in the current exceptions stated in Australian copyright legislation. Dr Hudson recommended that Section 200ab, regarding the use of works and other subject matter for certain purposes, be repealed and that ‘fair use’ be introduced in its place, similar to s107 of the US legislation.

Robin Wright, Swinburne University of Technology
Robin’s presentation focused on copyright and an ethical licensing model. She explored the ability of institutions to make digitised material available online and the impact of copyright laws on achieving this.

In proposing a solution the following requirements were identifed:

  • A standard / model license agreement
  • Institutions need to be able to operate in a digital environment beyond the existing exceptions
  • Protection of rights is important
  • A trustworthy mechanism is required

Links:

Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for Digitisation

 

 

 

 

 

September Record of the Month – State Bank Of Victoria House Plans and Designs


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These house plans were produced by the State Savings Bank of Victoria (VA 1041) and are a few examples of the different and versatile designs that this financial institution had on offer to their clients.

The State Savings Bank of Victoria provided many services, one of them being a credit foncier facility for mortgage loans and sale of debentures. From the 1920s the State Savings Bank of Victoria built homes for people of small means, this included the Garden City Estate at Fisherman’s Bend at Port Melbourne.

As an Access Services Officer and an employee of Public Record Office Victoria for the last 18 years I have seen a vast variety of records which I have found both fascinating and interesting. These House plan and design catalogues interest me as many of these houses still exist in older established suburbs. 

These catalogues display the different types of architecture and styles used from the 1920s to the 1960s.

The catalogues have many standard type designs but there are also the more elaborate ones for those who could afford them. Some of these more elaborate homes even have a bedroom set aside for a live in maid! 

These dwellings have stood the test of time due to their sound construction and have seen many families raised and nurtured in them both in the past and the present.

Written by Charlie Spiteri, Access Services Officer

What do those markings mean? Interpreting filing information on a key Ned Kelly record.

 

On Saturday 18 August, the Shepparton Times published an article about a copy of Ned Kelly’s Euroa Letter from our collection.  This was loaned by PROV to the Robert O’Hara Burke Museum for use in the Ned Kelly Festival. I do not want my postings in this blog to be dominated by entries about Kelly, especially since there is an entire page plus images and a full transcription about the letter, in our online Kelly exhibition. Click here to access the relevant page about the letter.

As an archivist, what interests me most about the record is the filing information on the record itself.

Let’s start with the cover sheet, known as the docket. This sheet was placed on the record by staff of the Chief Secretary’s Department when the record was filed. This sheet contains information (or to use a 21st century term, metadata) about the registration/filing of the item. The first element visible is the registered file number 80/T12640. The expression of registration number as well as the use and placement of the alphabetical character in it immediately reveal this to be a Chief Secretary’s file. Registry numbers used by the various Victorian Government Departments during the 19th and first half of the 20th century differ quite markedly and, to me, identify the provenance of their files as distinctively as a signature or a departmental letterhead. It is effectively a form of Victorian Government recordkeeping DNA.

Underneath the red circled number 1 is the following: “Date: Dec 14th” and “Reg. Nov 1/84”. Further down the page is an identification of the author and a précis of the letter; “Edward Kelly Glenrowan Gives statement of his murders of Sgt. Kennedy & others & makes other threats.” This information appears to be duplicated by information on pencil on the first page of the letter itself. This reads “Edward Kelly Posted at Glenrowan  Date Dec 14 Register in 1880” and on the left hand side “p.a”. In red ink is registry number T12640 and a red circled number 2.

 So what to make of all of this? The Euroa robbery take place on 14 December 1878 and Ned could not have posted the letter from Glenrowan a month after his execution. The key to understanding everything is the “p.a”. This is an abbreviation of the file registry term “put away” (or “filed”). If you understand that, everything else falls into place as what was written in pencil reveals itself to be a filing instruction. The instruction attributes the author of the item to Ned Kelly at Glenrowan (presumably reflecting a belief that the original was mailed from there) and directs that it be retrospectively registered in the Chief Secretary’s filing system within the numbering sequence of letters received in 1880.

 The proof of this comes from the entry in the Register (identified by reference to the letter T) that was used to document the allocation of number 12640. The image here shows the relevant page from the register (VPRS 3993/P0, unit 40, page 161). Although I could include the column headings in shot, the 1 Nov/84 appears in the date of registration column and the 14th Dec date appears in the date of the record (registered) column. The description of the item is exactly as appears on the docket and is in line with the instruction.

 All that remains is to speculate why it took until 1884 for the document to be registered. The final page of the document contains the annotation Xd and the initials WHO. I suspect this means the document was examined (Xd) by William Henry Odgers (WHO). Odgers was the Under Secretary of the Chief Secretary’s Department but died in 1881. All that can be stated with surety is that someone other than Odgers wrote the filing instruction in late 1884 but in error ordered it to be placed in the 1880 sequence rather than in the 1878 sequence. 

 Finally, you might have noticed that I have not made any reference to the red circled numbers on each page of the document. This was excluded from consideration because it was not the practice of the Chief Secretary’s Department to number pages in this way preferring instead to replicate the file number (i.e T12640) on each page. So where did it come from? My research into the accession history of the document, indicated that these numbers were written onto the file by staff of our predecessors, the State Library of Victoria, when it was one of a handful of Kelly related records transferred to it from the Department during 1955.

 Charlie Farrugia, Senior Collections Advisor

Page 4 of 15« First...23456...10...Last »